{"id":537,"date":"2013-05-19T09:48:39","date_gmt":"2013-05-19T09:48:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/monderlaw\/?p=537"},"modified":"2020-07-10T13:41:46","modified_gmt":"2020-07-10T13:41:46","slug":"dui-checkpoints","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/news\/dui-checkpoints\/","title":{"rendered":"DUI Checkpoints"},"content":{"rendered":"

The California Supreme Court did not declare DUI checkpoint unconstitutional.  However, the Court outlined eight factors that are \u201cimportant in assessing intrusiveness.\u201d Ingersoll v. Palmer<\/em>, 43 Cal.3d 1321, 1341 (1980).   These factors are used to minimize the intrusiveness of a DUI checkpoint. One of the eight factors is that the DUI checkpoint must be published in advance.  According to Ingersoll v. Palmer<\/em>, a California Supreme Court case, the Court stated that an \u201cadvance publicity is important to the maintenance of a constitutionally permissible sobriety checkpoint.\u201d Id<\/em> at 1346. The Court further stated that \u201cpublicity both reduces the intrusiveness of the stop and increases the deterrent effect of the roadblock.\u201d Id.<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

The goal of publishing the DUI checkpoints in advance is to deter people from driving under the influence. This could be achieved by \u201ceither dissuading people from taking ‘one more for the road,’ persuading them to drink at home, or inducing them to take taxicabs.\u201d Id.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, the \u201cadvance notice would limit intrusion upon personal dignity and security because those being stopped would anticipate and understand what was happening.” Id<\/em>.  Thus, according to the Court, announcing the DUI checkpoint in advance will reduce \u201csurprise, fear, and inconvenience.\u201d Id.<\/em><\/p>\n

If you have questions about DUI Checkpoints, contact San Diego DUI attorney Vik Monder or visit DUI Checkpoints Attorney<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The California Supreme Court did not declare DUI checkpoint unconstitutional.  However, the Court outlined eight factors that are \u201cimportant in assessing intrusiveness.\u201d Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321, 1341 (1980).   These factors are used to minimize the intrusiveness of a DUI checkpoint. One of the eight factors is that the DUI checkpoint must be published […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-537","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blog"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nDUI Checkpoints - Monder Criminal Lawyer Group CA<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The California Supreme Court did not declare DUI checkpoint unconstitutional. However, the Court outlined eight factors that are \u201cimportant in assessing intrusiveness.\u201d Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321, 1341 (1980). These factors are used to minimize the intrusiveness of a DUI checkpoint. One of the eight factors is that the DUI checkpoint must be published in advance.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/news\/dui-checkpoints\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"DUI Checkpoints - Monder Criminal Lawyer Group CA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The California Supreme Court did not declare DUI checkpoint unconstitutional. However, the Court outlined eight factors that are \u201cimportant in assessing intrusiveness.\u201d Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321, 1341 (1980). These factors are used to minimize the intrusiveness of a DUI checkpoint. One of the eight factors is that the DUI checkpoint must be published in advance.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/news\/dui-checkpoints\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Monder Criminal Lawyer Group CA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2013-05-19T09:48:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-07-10T13:41:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"DUI Checkpoints - Monder Criminal Lawyer Group CA","description":"The California Supreme Court did not declare DUI checkpoint unconstitutional. However, the Court outlined eight factors that are \u201cimportant in assessing intrusiveness.\u201d Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321, 1341 (1980). These factors are used to minimize the intrusiveness of a DUI checkpoint. One of the eight factors is that the DUI checkpoint must be published in advance.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/news\/dui-checkpoints\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"DUI Checkpoints - Monder Criminal Lawyer Group CA","og_description":"The California Supreme Court did not declare DUI checkpoint unconstitutional. However, the Court outlined eight factors that are \u201cimportant in assessing intrusiveness.\u201d Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321, 1341 (1980). These factors are used to minimize the intrusiveness of a DUI checkpoint. One of the eight factors is that the DUI checkpoint must be published in advance.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/news\/dui-checkpoints\/","og_site_name":"Monder Criminal Lawyer Group CA","article_published_time":"2013-05-19T09:48:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-07-10T13:41:46+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/news\/dui-checkpoints\/","url":"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/news\/dui-checkpoints\/","name":"DUI Checkpoints - Monder Criminal Lawyer Group CA","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2013-05-19T09:48:39+00:00","dateModified":"2020-07-10T13:41:46+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7f4616cba715a487c1605b93af866a74"},"description":"The California Supreme Court did not declare DUI checkpoint unconstitutional. However, the Court outlined eight factors that are \u201cimportant in assessing intrusiveness.\u201d Ingersoll v. Palmer, 43 Cal.3d 1321, 1341 (1980). These factors are used to minimize the intrusiveness of a DUI checkpoint. One of the eight factors is that the DUI checkpoint must be published in advance.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/news\/dui-checkpoints\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/news\/dui-checkpoints\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/news\/dui-checkpoints\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"DUI Checkpoints"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/","name":"Monder Criminal Lawyer Group CA","description":"Just another WordPress site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7f4616cba715a487c1605b93af866a74","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1bcef7789a7964d3c26ef1f432360330493f8432ad76de0170d901f2e19946d3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1bcef7789a7964d3c26ef1f432360330493f8432ad76de0170d901f2e19946d3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"url":"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/news\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/537","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=537"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/537\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":538,"href":"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/537\/revisions\/538"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=537"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=537"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.monderlaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=537"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}